USA
Germany
Russia
Moldova
For mission-critical servers in enterprise and fintech, we choose Go as our primary backend development technology. This decision rests on benchmarks, not preferences. Go outperforms Node.js by 2.6x in CPU-bound tasks. Ryan Dahl, the creator of Node.js, stated publicly: "For servers, I can't imagine using anything other than Go." He also admitted that Node.js limitations drove him to leave his own project. In this article, we examine the engineering rationale behind choosing Go for high-load systems.
When a product grows beyond its MVP phase, development speed stops being the primary metric. SLAs emerge, on-call rotations begin, compliance requirements appear, and the cost of incidents starts to matter more than the cost of building. The stack you choose determines how expensive your system will be to operate, debug, and evolve over the next decade.
What the Node.js Creator Said About Go
Understanding Ryan Dahl's perspective provides crucial context. He created Node.js in 2009, popularized event-driven non-blocking I/O for JavaScript, and left the project in 2012. Years later, he shared his evolved thinking on server-side development.
Dahl's key insight concerns how developers reason about concurrent code. Go's goroutines provide a blocking-style interface to the programmer, even though the runtime handles non-blocking I/O underneath. This means code looks sequential and straightforward, making execution flow and error handling easier to trace.
His exact words carry weight:
"For a particular class of application, which is like, if you're building a server, I can't imagine using anything other than Go."
He went further about Node.js limitations:
"I think Node is not the best system to build a massive server web. I would use Go for that. And honestly, that's the reason why I left Node."
On the programming model, Dahl explained why Go feels more natural for server code:
"If you have a bunch of following actions, it's nice to be able to say: do thing A, wait for a response, maybe error out. Do thing B, wait for a response, error out. And in Node, that's harder, because you have to jump into another function call."
Key takeaway: This is not a language war. The creator of Node.js recognizing the boundaries of his creation signals engineering maturity. For large-scale server infrastructure, Go's programming model offers clear advantages.
Where Node.js Excels
Before explaining why we choose Go for critical backends, we must acknowledge where Node.js genuinely shines. Ignoring these strengths would make our analysis incomplete.
Node.js enables fast iteration on REST APIs, especially for teams proficient in JavaScript. The unified language across frontend and backend reduces context switching. For Backend-for-Frontend layers that aggregate data for specific clients, Node.js often provides the shortest path to production.
WebSocket-based applications, chat systems, and notification services benefit from Node.js's event-driven architecture. When workload is predominantly I/O-bound—waiting for database responses, external API calls, or file operations—Node.js handles concurrency efficiently.
The npm registry contains over 800,000 packages. For frontend tooling, build systems, SSR implementations, and edge computing, Node.js remains practical. The ecosystem maturity for these use cases is difficult to match.
The bottom line: Node.js works well when the service boundary is defined and workload characteristics match its strengths.
Why Node.js Isn't for High-Load Fintech Cores
In fintech and enterprise core systems, workload profiles change significantly. CPU-intensive operations like encryption, scoring algorithms, fraud detection, and data aggregation become part of the critical path. Latency requirements become strict, with p95 and p99 percentiles specified in SLAs.
Node.js runs application code in a single JavaScript thread by default. The event loop excels at non-blocking I/O, but when a request performs CPU-intensive computation, all concurrent requests wait.
Worker threads exist as mitigation, but they add architectural complexity. Horizontally scaling Node.js processes works, but the single-threaded nature imposes a ceiling on value extracted from each server core.
In large codebases maintained by multiple teams over years, async chains, error propagation, context management, and operation cancellation require strict discipline. The cognitive overhead accumulates. This matches what Dahl meant about "jumping into another function call" to trace request flow.
The npm ecosystem's size creates supply chain risk. In 2025, attacks compromised packages with billions of weekly downloads. Enterprise environments require lockfile policies, dependency allow-lists, and software composition analysis scanners. The volume of transitive dependencies increases attack surface.
Summary: In fintech cores, we optimize for total cost of ownership and operational predictability—not initial development speed.
Why Go Is Proven for Enterprise Servers
Go was designed at Google for building large-scale networked services. Its design decisions align with enterprise infrastructure requirements: static typing, compiled binaries, built-in concurrency primitives, and minimal runtime dependencies.
Goroutines are functions that execute concurrently, managed by the Go runtime rather than the operating system. Starting thousands of goroutines is practical and common. The runtime multiplexes them across available CPU cores efficiently. Each goroutine uses approximately 2KB of memory, compared to roughly 1MB for a worker thread.
The programming model matches what Dahl praised: sequential-looking code that blocks when waiting for I/O, with the runtime handling scheduling. Error handling uses explicit return values, making success and failure paths visible in code structure.
Go includes a race detector that finds data races in concurrent code during testing. This proves critical for high-load systems where race conditions manifest only under production traffic. The toolchain provides profiling, benchmarking, and code coverage out of the box.
The compiler produces a single static binary with no external dependencies. Deployment simplifies to copying one file. Container images stay minimal, improving security posture and startup time.
Enterprise adoption evidence:
- Monzo built their banking platform entirely on Go, handling 4,000 transactions per second at peak with 99.9% uptime for over 7.5 million customers
- PayPal reported 10% reduction in CPU usage after migrating critical services to Go
- Capital One found "huge performance improvement vs Java" in their proof-of-concept tests
- Major infrastructure projects run on Go: Kubernetes, Docker, Terraform, Prometheus
These represent years of production experience at scale, not theoretical claims.
How We Make Stack Decisions
Stack selection follows a structured evaluation, similar to a technical audit process. We assess multiple criteria before committing to technology choices for critical systems.
Evaluation criteria:
| Criterion | Questions We Ask |
|---|---|
| Load Profile | Expected RPS, concurrent users, growth trajectory |
| Latency | p95/p99 requirements, SLA commitments |
| CPU Profile | I/O-bound vs CPU-bound ratio |
| Fault Tolerance | Failover requirements, degradation strategy |
| Security | Compliance needs, audit trail requirements |
| Team | Existing skills, hiring market, training costs |
We draw clear responsibility boundaries. "Core fintech" components—payment orchestration, ledger services, fraud engines—default to Go. "Edge/BFF/tools" components may use Node.js where appropriate.
Supporting practices reinforce the choice: load testing before launch, continuous profiling in production, defined SLO/SLA metrics, and documented incident response procedures. Performance monitoring and SEO optimization also play a role in overall system health.
Our position: Maturity means selecting stacks based on risks and ownership economics, not industry trends.
Where Node.js Remains Appropriate
We do not prohibit Node.js. We deploy it where it delivers maximum value without inflating risks.
Valid Node.js use cases in enterprise:
- Frontend tooling, SSR, edge computing tasks
- BFF layers with clear architectural boundaries
- Quick integration services and prototypes
- Real-time gateways with limited CPU operations
The right architecture places each tool where it fits best. Go handles the critical path. Node.js handles supporting roles where its strengths apply.
Conclusion
Ryan Dahl's statements mark industry maturity, not Node.js condemnation. For "massive servers," the creator of Node.js recommends Go. His reasoning: clarity of programming model, easier maintenance, better long-term support.
We choose Go for the same reasons. We build enterprise and fintech systems designed to handle growth, pass audits, and sustain years of changes without losing stability. The benchmarks support this: Go delivers 2-4x better throughput under load. The industry supports this: Monzo, PayPal, and Capital One run critical infrastructure on Go.
Node.js remains valuable for the right use cases. The goal is not language purity but engineering effectiveness.
Ready to discuss your project's technology stack? Our team can help evaluate requirements and recommend the right approach for your specific context. We also offer AI-powered optimization for modern digital products.
Why did the creator of Node.js switch to Go?
Ryan Dahl, Node.js creator, stated that Go's programming model is better for servers. He said: 'Node is not the best system for massive web servers, I would use Go for that... that's why I left Node.' Go's goroutines provide cleaner concurrent code than Node.js async patterns.
How much faster is Go than Node.js?
Go outperforms Node.js by 2.6x in CPU-bound tasks on average. In HTTP server benchmarks, Go handles 180,000+ requests per second compared to Node.js's ~40,000. Memory usage is also lower: Go uses 75-120MB while Node.js typically requires 300MB+ for similar workloads.
When should I use Node.js instead of Go?
Node.js excels for I/O-bound tasks, real-time WebSocket applications, Backend-for-Frontend layers, frontend tooling, and rapid prototyping. If your workload is predominantly waiting for database responses or external APIs rather than CPU computation, Node.js handles concurrency efficiently.
Which fintech companies use Go?
Major fintech companies using Go include Monzo (entire banking platform, 4,000 TPS, 99.9% uptime), PayPal (10% CPU reduction after migration), Capital One, American Express, MercadoLibre, and Curve. Infrastructure projects like Kubernetes, Docker, and Terraform are also written in Go.
What are goroutines and why do they matter?
Goroutines are lightweight functions that execute concurrently, managed by Go's runtime rather than the OS. Each goroutine uses only ~2KB of memory versus ~1MB for a traditional thread. This enables running thousands of concurrent operations efficiently. Ryan Dahl praised Go's blocking-style interface as easier to reason about than Node.js async patterns.
Is Node.js dead for backend development?
No. Node.js remains valuable for specific use cases: I/O-bound services, real-time applications, BFF layers, and rapid prototyping. Even Ryan Dahl acknowledged Node.js has its place. The key is choosing the right tool for your specific requirements. For high-load fintech cores, Go is often better; for quick APIs and real-time features, Node.js excels.
